Age and metastasis - How age influences metastatic spread in cancer. Colorectal cancer as a model.

Metastasis is the major cause of death in cancer patients. Whereas colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence increases with age, metastatic spread seems to decline. Furthermore, the epidemiology of CRC is changing. There is an increase in CRC incidence in the young, presenting at an advanced stage with higher likelihood of synchronous or metachronous metastases, and a decline in CRC incidence and metastatic spread in the oldest-old. Emerging data suggest that age-related changes with regard to tumor biology (e.g. genomic instability), the tumor microenvironment (e.g. inflammaging) and the immune system (e.g. immunosenescence), complemented by interaction between the genome and exposome might contribute to the observed metastatic patterns. As aging is a key prognostic factor, this highlights the need for further studies investigating age-related patterns and underlying mechanisms of tumor growth and dissemination. Eventually, this might allow for better risk stratification, refinement of screening strategies and follow-up care as well as therapies tailored to reflect patient age and that might possibly target responsible biomarkers in a precision medicine approach. This review aims to discuss the influence of aging on metastatic spread in colorectal cancer and elucidate underlying mechanisms responsible for the observed metastatic patterns.

LIN28 promotes tumorigenesis in colorectal cancer but is not associated with metastatic spread.

BACKGROUND: Tumor stem cells play a role in metastatic spread in colorectal cancer (CRC). The oncogene LIN28A/B, a prognostic marker in CRC, is involved in tumorigenesis and maintains stem cell function. Therefore, it was the aim of the present study to clarify whether LIN28A/B is involved in metastatic spread in CRC. METHODS: Expression of LIN28A/B was analyzed in patients with colon adenocarcinoma in a matched case-control study comparing patients with corresponding liver metastases (n = 42) and patients without hepatic spread within five years (n = 42) by applying immunohistochemistry. Further, LIN28A/B expression was correlated with stem cell associated markers (SOX2, CD133). RESULTS: LIN28A and B expression significantly correlated with SOX2 expression (p = .02, and p = .04 respectively) but not with CD133 expression. This correlation between LIN28 A/B and SOX2 was not reflected in differences in hepatic spread. In this respect, there was no significant association between LIN28A/B expression and liver metastases. CONCLUSION: LIN28A/B might be involved in tumor initiation and progression in CRC but is not associated with hepatic spread.

Effect of platelet inhibition with perioperative aspirin on survival in patients undergoing curative resection for pancreatic cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: The importance of platelets in the pathogenesis of metastasis formation is increasingly recognized. Although evidence from epidemiologic studies suggests positive effects of aspirin on metastasis formation, there is little clinical data on the perioperative use of this drug in pancreatic cancer patients. METHODS: From all patients who received curative intent surgery for pancreatic cancer between 2014 and 2016 at our institution, we identified 18 patients that took aspirin at time of admission and continued to throughout the inpatient period. Using propensity score matching, we selected a control group of 64 patients without aspirin intake from our database and assessed the effect of aspirin medication on overall, disease-free, and hematogenous metastasis-free survival intervals as endpoints. RESULTS: Aspirin intake proved to be independently associated with improved mean overall survival (OS) (46.5 vs. 24.6 months, *p = 0.006), median disease-free survival (DFS) (26 vs. 10.5 months, *p = 0.001) and mean hematogenous metastasis-free survival (HMFS) (41.9 vs. 16.3 months, *p = 0.005). Three-year survival rates were 61.1% in patients with aspirin intake vs. 26.3% in patients without aspirin intake. Multivariate cox regression showed significant independent association of aspirin with all three survival endpoints with hazard ratios of 0.36 (95% CI 0.15-0.86) for OS (*p = 0.021), 0.32 (95% CI 0.16-0.63) for DFS (**p = 0.001), and 0.36 (95% CI 0.16-0.77) for HMFS (*p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in our retrospective, propensity-score matched study showed significantly better overall survival when taking aspirin while undergoing curative surgery for pancreatic cancer. This was mainly due to a prolonged metastasis-free interval following surgery.

Mechanisms of Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer and Metastatic Organotropism: Hematogenous versus Peritoneal Spread.

Metastasis is the major cause of death in patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC). The most common sites of metastasis are the liver and the peritoneum. Peritoneal carcinomatosis is often considered the end stage of the disease after the tumor has spread to the liver. However, almost half of CRC patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis do not present with liver metastasis. This brings up the question of whether peritoneal spread can still be considered as the end stage of a metastasized CRC or whether it should just be interpreted as a site of metastasis alternative to the liver. This review tries to discuss this question and summarize the current status of literature on potential characteristics in tumor biology in the primary tumor, i.e., factors (transcription factors and direct and indirect E-cadherin repressors) and pathways (WNT, TGF-ß, and RAS) modulating EMT, regulation of EMT on a posttranscriptional and posttranslational level (miRNAs), and angiogenesis. In addition to tumor-specific characteristics, factors in the tumor microenvironment, immunological markers, ways of transport of tumor cells, and adhesion molecules appear to differ between hematogenous and peritoneal spread. Factors such as integrins and exosomal integrins, cancer stem cell phenotype, and miRNA expression appear to contribute in determining the metastatic route. We went through each step of the metastasis process comparing hematogenous to peritoneal spread. We identified differences with respect to organotropism, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, angiogenesis and inflammation, and tumor microenvironment which will be further elucidated in this review. A better understanding of the underlying mechanisms and contributing factors of metastasis development in CRC has huge relevance as it is the foundation to help find specific targets for treatment of CRC.